jholbrook
21.10.2007, 15:34
We get the Journal at the office, and right on the front page of the "bible" on October 8th was a huge article relating to the watch industry. Here's a link on their website:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119178753176051433.html?mod=hpp_us_pageone
I consider this article (dare I say expose?) a pretty BIG DEAL. It's particularly damaging to Patek, Omega, and Antiquorum (the new owners of Timezone).
I also wasn't aware that Osvaldo Patrizzi had been ousted from Antiquorum...though it sounds like for reasons other than the focus of the article.
Does the article change how you feel about brands like Omega and Patek? for me it does. Rolex? I have first hand knowledge that Rolex DOES NOT directly participate in Antiquorum's auctions - though I never knew why until now. Perhaps their wanting to remain above such accusations are at the core - notice that while the article does point out that Antiquorum has had Rolex auctions, they do not name Rolex as they do Patek and Omega as brands that have taken part in direct bidding.
Your thoughts?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119178753176051433.html?mod=hpp_us_pageone
I consider this article (dare I say expose?) a pretty BIG DEAL. It's particularly damaging to Patek, Omega, and Antiquorum (the new owners of Timezone).
I also wasn't aware that Osvaldo Patrizzi had been ousted from Antiquorum...though it sounds like for reasons other than the focus of the article.
Does the article change how you feel about brands like Omega and Patek? for me it does. Rolex? I have first hand knowledge that Rolex DOES NOT directly participate in Antiquorum's auctions - though I never knew why until now. Perhaps their wanting to remain above such accusations are at the core - notice that while the article does point out that Antiquorum has had Rolex auctions, they do not name Rolex as they do Patek and Omega as brands that have taken part in direct bidding.
Your thoughts?