philipp
13.11.2007, 23:07
Hi,
I have a very special Tudor Big Crown in..why is it so special and exciting to me?? The inside of the caseback has been signed Rolex with reference 6538 but has been crossed and remarked to 7922 with a date stamp of III '57. Furthermore between the lugs it is stamped 7922 and a serial of 307xxx..First thought of mine was strange?! 307xxx for a Big Crown of Tudor with the rare early reference 7922 is much too late and doesn't make any sense...& previous posts of mine shows that most of the Tudor 7924 BC had serial 275XXX and 292xxx & date stamp of IV'58 and the Tudor 7928 Square Crown were at least 305xxx with date stamp of IV '59....
So, i started my researche again...
Recently i bought my first big crown with 7922 reference with tropical dial. After a closer examination i noticed that this brown has a rolex caseback with datestamp I-1956 and serial 140xxx. No Tudor caseback but a Rolex 6538 caseback..hmmmmm maybe the caseback was changed..no clear answer to me till i got my newest 7922 in with the same Rolex caseback and also stamped 6538 but here we see that the 6538 has been crossed and put 7922 under. I took a Rolex Big Crown i have in my collection and check the caseback with date stamp and serial..it is a 6538 with also 140xxx serial dating it from I-'56 and only 42 number away from the brown 7922. That started me thinking and with me some friends and here is the IMHO conclusion:
The serials of the early 7922 Tudors Big Crowns are from Rolex and NOT in the range of Tudor..140xxx makes I-1956 & 307xxx makes III '57 with rolex serials!
So back again to the title of this message: Are these early 7922 Tudor's or Rolexes?? What we see now is that in the early years Rolex cased the 7922 in a Rolex case with matching Rolex serial numbers and in some cases a crossed 6538 reference inside the caseback. I know that the great collectors and dealers of the world are faithfull to the crown and only Rolex on the dial makes it a Rolex but as i wanted to mention with this post is that these early Tudor Big Crowns are coming very close and they show us that the line between Tudor and Rolex has not yet been very clear at that time at the Geneva HQ. IMHO you get more authentic Rolex than they ever made in all Tudors afterwards..The whole case and crown is Rolex except the dial and movement..last propably to market them differently by [french] demand in these early days of the Big Crown evolution....
Except this surprising case analyse, my newest BC has also a rare underline & red triangle bezel ; - ))
Any more thoughts here?? Every info is welcome!
Enjoy the pictures, Rgrds.Philipp
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922underline2.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922BCunderline.jpg
And here the caseback of the meantioned Tudor BC 7922 with brown dial - I'56 & 140XXX
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline4.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline5.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline3.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline6.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline11.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline8.jpg
And here the caseback of the meantioned Tudor BC 7922 with brown dial - I'56 & 140XXX
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922underline12.jpg
Here we see the crossed 6538 reference, 7922 stamp and III-'57...
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/rolex6538caseback.jpg
I have a very special Tudor Big Crown in..why is it so special and exciting to me?? The inside of the caseback has been signed Rolex with reference 6538 but has been crossed and remarked to 7922 with a date stamp of III '57. Furthermore between the lugs it is stamped 7922 and a serial of 307xxx..First thought of mine was strange?! 307xxx for a Big Crown of Tudor with the rare early reference 7922 is much too late and doesn't make any sense...& previous posts of mine shows that most of the Tudor 7924 BC had serial 275XXX and 292xxx & date stamp of IV'58 and the Tudor 7928 Square Crown were at least 305xxx with date stamp of IV '59....
So, i started my researche again...
Recently i bought my first big crown with 7922 reference with tropical dial. After a closer examination i noticed that this brown has a rolex caseback with datestamp I-1956 and serial 140xxx. No Tudor caseback but a Rolex 6538 caseback..hmmmmm maybe the caseback was changed..no clear answer to me till i got my newest 7922 in with the same Rolex caseback and also stamped 6538 but here we see that the 6538 has been crossed and put 7922 under. I took a Rolex Big Crown i have in my collection and check the caseback with date stamp and serial..it is a 6538 with also 140xxx serial dating it from I-'56 and only 42 number away from the brown 7922. That started me thinking and with me some friends and here is the IMHO conclusion:
The serials of the early 7922 Tudors Big Crowns are from Rolex and NOT in the range of Tudor..140xxx makes I-1956 & 307xxx makes III '57 with rolex serials!
So back again to the title of this message: Are these early 7922 Tudor's or Rolexes?? What we see now is that in the early years Rolex cased the 7922 in a Rolex case with matching Rolex serial numbers and in some cases a crossed 6538 reference inside the caseback. I know that the great collectors and dealers of the world are faithfull to the crown and only Rolex on the dial makes it a Rolex but as i wanted to mention with this post is that these early Tudor Big Crowns are coming very close and they show us that the line between Tudor and Rolex has not yet been very clear at that time at the Geneva HQ. IMHO you get more authentic Rolex than they ever made in all Tudors afterwards..The whole case and crown is Rolex except the dial and movement..last propably to market them differently by [french] demand in these early days of the Big Crown evolution....
Except this surprising case analyse, my newest BC has also a rare underline & red triangle bezel ; - ))
Any more thoughts here?? Every info is welcome!
Enjoy the pictures, Rgrds.Philipp
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922underline2.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922BCunderline.jpg
And here the caseback of the meantioned Tudor BC 7922 with brown dial - I'56 & 140XXX
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline4.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline5.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline3.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline6.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline11.jpg
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922bcunderline8.jpg
And here the caseback of the meantioned Tudor BC 7922 with brown dial - I'56 & 140XXX
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/tudor7922underline12.jpg
Here we see the crossed 6538 reference, 7922 stamp and III-'57...
http://i157.photobucket.com/albums/t64/stahlauctioneers/rolex6538caseback.jpg